Dan wallace vs bart ehrman biography

Bart Ehrman is a skilled

As promised, here are some further reflections on last night’s debate between Bart Ehrman and Dan Wallace. First of all, both men did a good job presenting their case and responding to each other’s questions. Bart Ehrman is a skilled debater and a very gifted communicator.

It all depends on who Expectations soared for the two scholars debating—our own Dr. Daniel B. Wallace and Dr. Bart D. Ehrman—and neither would disappoint. The moderator, Dr. Mark Chancey, a former student of Ehrman’s and chairman of the Religious Studies Department at SMU, did an outstanding job introducing the speakers, fielding the questions, and keeping the.

On February 1st, 2012 I The second debate between Dr. Bart D. Ehrman and Dr. Daniel B. Wallace, held at SMU, is now available to view on YouTube. The two scholars debated the issue of whether or not we can trust the text of the New Testament on October 1,

Bart Ehrman is well known On February 1st, I had a public debate with Dan Wallace, professor of New Testament at Dallas Theological Seminary. The event was sponsored by The Ehrman Project, which, despite its name, is something I’ve never had anything to do with (I believe it is now defunct); it is/was an attempt by conservative Christians to debunk what I have.

Dan Wallace, professor of Wallace, along with DTS colleague Darrell L. Bock, has been an outspoken critic of the alleged "popular culture" quest to discredit conservative evangelical views of Jesus—including the writings of Elaine Pagels and Bart Ehrman. [2] He is a contributor to the Ehrman Project, a site that critiques the writings of Bart Ehrman. [3].

Although Eichenwald enlists Bart Ehrman From what I've managed to gather from Tim R.'s summaries, the discussions between Ehrman and Wallace echoed their books. A lot.

Ehrman grew up as a On Wednesday, February 1, , I debated Bart Ehrman on his home turf at UNC Chapel Hill. The topic: Is the original New Testament lost? The format was a minute opener from each of us (Bart, then me), followed by two rounds of 5-minute responses to the other man.

In Wallace's final point he argued Do we have enough evidence to reconstruct the New Testament text? Or did early scribes corrupt it beyond repair? Daniel B. Wallace and Bart D. Ehrman debate.